Friday, November 15, 2013

Blog 11: Summary and Analysis of Initial Responses to the Poem

Summary:

The responses to Robert Browning’s The Ring and the Book varied greatly but they all praised Browning’s unique use of language and his very distinct personal style in some form or another. The three pieces I examined all had something to say about his characterization. In the [Unsigned], Spectator 41 (December 12, 1868): 1464-66 the article says, “He is, as he always is, semi-dramatic, with the keenest of all eyes for every qualifying circumstance which alters the point of view of each age and each individual…” (774-775).  In the review “Richelieu” [unidentified], Vanity Fair 1 it discusses the way Browning portrays people. It says, “…[The Ring and the Book is] a burning protest against the atheistic belief that men and women are the creatures of circumstances…” (774). It focused on the idea that Browning portrayed reality and that it is not for the faint of heart. In addition, the final review I looked at glorified the book. It reads, “…The Ring and the Book, which is so marked by picture and characterization, so rich in pleading and debating, so full of those verbal touches in which Browning has no equal, and of those verbal involutions in which he has fortunately no rival” (777). These three articles were able to see Browning’s uniqueness and complex ability.

Analysis:


I think it is very important to look at the complexities of Browning’s detail. In reading The Ring and the Book, I have come to see that every single detail Browning includes has purpose. He uses each detail to add layer upon layer to his message and narrative. The articles also touched on his irregularities or peculiarities of some of his language and how he almost uses them to create a game for the reader. It makes the reader search here and there to keep up with his message. I think his writing challenges the reader to look further and I really like that.

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Paper #1 :A Place Beyond the Page: A Close Reading of Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s Poem “Mother and Poet”

Katherine Trujillo-Johnston
Dr. Hague
English 370
1 November 2013

A Place Beyond the Page: A Close Reading of Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s Poem “Mother and Poet”
The “Mother and Poet” by Elizabeth Barrett Browning is dramatic monologue first published in 1861. This poem is one in a collection of poems that EBB released before her death. This particular collection of poems was declared by many to define EBB as a multi-faceted person: claiming her to possess the qualities of a woman, poet, politician and mother. The speaker in the piece is an Italian poet named Olimpia Rossi Savio, Baronessa di Bernstrel, known for her passion filled poetry centered on Italian freedom. The poem is biographical in that it describes the loss of her two sons during the Italian Revolution. The poem is broken into twenty stanzas with irregular line lengths and an ending rhyme scheme. This poem by EBB depicts the grief of a mother while commenting on large issues like politics, war, death, and patriotism.
            In the first few stanzas the narrative begins by describing the death of the speaker’s sons and makes a statement that describes the speakers stance. EBB writes, “Dead! One of them shot by the sea in the east,/ And one of them shot in the west by the sea./ Dead! both my boys! When you sit at the feast/ And are wanting a great song for Italy free,/ Let none look at me” (1-5)! In this first stanza we find out our speaker has suffered great loss and we also know from the background that her sons died fighting for Italian independence. I think it is very important that the speaker says she will not be singing about Italy’s newfound freedom. It immediately lets us know that she cannot find happiness in her countries advancement. In addition, although her stanzas are irregular, it is important to notice the shorter ending line that has similar syllables throughout the all the stanzas. The final lines all assert her feelings with a very finalizing tone.
            Further on in the poem EBB sets up the mother child relationship. In other words she creates a bond between the speaker and her sons. She writes, “What art can a woman be good at? Oh, vain!/ What art is she good at, but hurting her breast/ With the milk-teeth of babes, and a smile at the pain?/ Ah boys, how you hurt! you were strong as you pressed,/ And I proud, by that test” (11-15).  I think EBB purposely shows the pride a mother feels because she wants to evoke a certain emotion from her reader. She creates sympathy by showing the love and connection between a mother and son. A little ways down she also writes about the things the mother teaches her sons, “To teach them…It stings there! I made them indeed/ Speak plain the word country. I taught them no doubt,/ That a country’s a thing men should die for at need./ I prated of liberty, rights, and about/ The tyrant cast out” (21-25). The speaker feels responsible for her sons’ deaths because she is the one who created their beliefs about patriotism and country. When she says it stings she means the knowledge she now has about what she did hurts her. It brings to mind the saying “putting salt in an open wound.” She also says, “I exulted; nay, let them go forth at the wheels/ Of the guns, and denied not” (27-28). She had the opportunity to not let her sons go off to war but she let them go anyway and there is an overwhelming tone of regret.
            EBB then goes on and tells about the letters of glory and triumph that come to the narrator from her boys and they describe camp-life. They tell their mom of the first victories they win but then her first son dies and the letters from her other son change from happy to sad. Then he dies. After the death EBB writes, “O Christ of the five wounds, who look’dst through the dark/ To the face of Thy mother! Consider, I pray,/ How we common mothers stand desolate, mark,/ Whose sons, not being Christs, die with eyes turned away,/ And no last word to say” (66-70)! This stanza creates the picture of all the other mothers that are in similar situations, losing their sons to war.
            Finally, in the last few stanzas EBB addresses the political side to her poem. She talks about how after Italy has won and Rome and Venice are celebrating that she does not want to be a part of it. She claims her Italy is in the sky where her sons are and she addresses the people of Italy and says, “When you have your country from mountain to sea, / When King Victor has Italy’s crown on his head, / And I have my Dead—/ What then” (82-86)? In other words, EBB has her speaker questioning the actions of her country. In the second to last stanza EBB creates a powerful metaphor that questions war. It reads, “Forgive me. Some women bear children in strength,/ And bite back the cry of their pain in self-scorn;/ But the birth pangs of nations will wring us at length/ Into a wail such as this—and we sit on forlorn/ When the man-child is born” (91-95). The metaphor of Italy’s revolution as a mother giving birth is a powerful image that brings to question many things. And the final stanza of the poem is the repetition of the first stanza, which brings the poem full circle. The speaker told her story and is restating her original claim.
            In this poem EBB is questioning the price of war. She sees another crown worn but she questions at what expense? The speaker cannot be happy for her country because her loss was too great and that is why she will not sing a song of praise. Also the speaker is forced to question her mothering. She admits that she has taught her sons to be patriotic and to be willing to sacrifice their own lives for the cause, but she has to live with the consequences of that.
            Today the questions EBB poses in her poem “Mother and Poet,” can still be applied. She challenges the cost of war and describes the hardships of parenting. It leaves you wondering why countries are built on overpowering one another. At the end of the poem you know gain Italy has made but you also know the loss its’ people have suffered.



















Works Cited